Thanks Guys! All information is valuable. I'll look up our setting and try to tune our Slurm cluster to get higher performance.
Best, Kota -------------------------------------------- 露崎 浩太 (Kota Tsuyuzaki) kota.tsuyuzaki...@hco.ntt.co.jp NTTソフトウェアイノベーションセンタ 分散処理基盤技術プロジェクト 0422-59-2837 --------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: slurm-users <slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com> On Behalf Of Kevin > Buckley > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:32 AM > To: Slurm User Community List <slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>; Christopher > Samuel <ch...@csamuel.org> > Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Rate Limiting of RPC calls > > On 2021/02/10 09:33, Christopher Samuel wrote: > > > > Also getting users to use `sacct` rather than `squeue` to check what > > state a job is in can help a lot too, it reduces the load on slurmctld. > > That raises an interesting take on the two utilities, Chris, in that > > 1) It should be possible to write a wrapper, or even a binary, > that gives the user the squeue format using the API calls > which sacct targets, for a subset of squeue functionality ? > > 2) How much of the functionality of squeue would be lost if > SchedMD had only provided an "sacct with squeue formatting" > and how much of the lost functionality would really be > missed? > > Kevin > -- > Supercomputing Systems Administrator > Pawsey Supercomputing Centre
