I do want them to have both, just not at the same time. I'm looking for a slightly more automated way to either turn the priority on the QoS down when there's a reservation, or force them to 'use up' the priority resources within the reservation.
Sounds like we'll have to solve it with some scripting, then. Tina On 28/10/2019 19:02, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 06:40:48PM +0000, Tina Friedrich wrote: >> That's fine and all sounds nice but doesn't precisely help me solve my >> problem - which is how to ensure that people can't access both >> scheduling priority and a reservation at the same time. I'm not going to >> be able to change our terms for co-investment on the grounds of can't >> figure out how to set that up. > > This sounds more like a policy problem and less like a technological > one. If you've got bad-faith users, no amount of programming is going > to fix that. On the flip side, if you don't want them to have both > reserved nodes and higher QoS, why did you tell them they could have > both? > > khm >