Hi Yair, Thanks for the information. I guess I'll just have to try it out.
I did have multiple QOS working fine. However, after I modified one of the QOS the users suddenly couldn't use any of the non-default QOS. Maybe I'll have a look at the database myself too. Cheers, Loris Yair Yarom <ir...@cs.huji.ac.il> writes: > Hi, > > From my experience - yes, new associations will be associated with the > QOS of the account. > > I believe it doesn't explicitly modifies all the associations, just > notifies you which associations will be affected. Looking at my database > suggests that indeed most associations don't have explicit QOS (but I'm > not very proficient with slurm's database, so I might be wrong). > > HTH, > Yair. > > On Tue, Feb 06 2018, "Loris Bennett" <loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> [I didn't get an answer to this when I tacked it onto the end of another >> question (which I also didn't get an answer to :-/), so I'm starting a >> new thread.] >> >> The documentation for 'sacctmgr' says >> >> Note: the QOS that can be used at a given account in the hierarchy are >> inherited by the children of that account. >> >> However, if I do the following: >> >> $ sacctmgr modify account name=root set qos+=medium,short >> >> the result is >> >> Modified account associations... >> C = soroban A = root >> C = soroban A = anemometry U = alice >> C = soroban A = anemometry U = bob >> C = soroban A = barometry U = carol >> C = soroban A = barometry U = dave >> C = soroban A = calorimetry U = ethel >> ... >> >> To me this looks as if the QOS are in fact being explicitly added to >> each association (rather than being just implicitly inherited). In this >> case, will a new association added within this hierarchy automatically >> be associated with the QOS available to the other associations? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Loris -- Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.) ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de
