Hi Maxim and all others! Thanks for the answer, very useful for me/us, could you please give me a hint where I can find this documentation so I can throw it up in their faces ☺
I cant find it where it really says these facts directly, or maybe one another just need to read between the lines and figure it out themselves from all the facts. Thanks in advance Regards /Roland Nyberg Från: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:[email protected]] Skickat: den 22 november 2017 18:30 Till: Roland Nyberg Kopia: [email protected] Ämne: Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding SSRC and Seq in RTP Roland, I think you have a point. There are at least two RFC violations at play: 1. Seq should be monotonically increasing for a given SSRC unless it overflows. 2. If you reset SSRC/Seq/TS for whatever reason the new value should be random, not 0 and all 3 have to be reset together IMHO. -Max On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Roland Nyberg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Folks! Could anyone tell me why and howcome the "Seq" starts all over from zero after the ACK and the "SSRC" still are the same? Shouldn't the SSRC change after the ACK or is this common? Have not seen this behavior before. [cid:[email protected]] Vänliga hälsningar, best regards Roland Nyberg SIP-technician IP-Only | Besöksadress: Västra Järnvägsg. 7, Stockholm Vxl: 018-843 1000 | Mobil: 07X- XXXXXXXX Se filmen om IP-Only<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrq98_joT4Y> Följ oss på Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/ip.only.ab> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/ip_only> | Linkedin<https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/28139/> ip-only.se<http://ip-only.se><http://www.ip-only.se/> [cid:[email protected]] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
