Hi Expert, I found the problem. Thanks for making comment on my request.
BR/// Rakesh Kumar Mohanty On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Dale R. Worley <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> writes: > >> Contact: "" > >> <sip:[email protected]:36948;transport=udp;Hpt=8ea2_16;ssn;srti=s1_2> > >> Contact: "" > >> <sip:[email protected]:36948;transport=udp;Hpt=8ea2_16; > ssn;srti=s1_2;TRC=ffffffff-ffffffff> > > > > What leads you to this conclusion? Parameter order is never relevant. > > Specifically, a little earlier in section 19.1.4 is: > > o The ordering of parameters and header fields is not significant > in comparing SIP and SIPS URIs. > > >> I am facing an issue on which the contact URI comparison has happened > and > >> it fails due to the TRC parameter not in order which I guess so far. > > By the rules of 3261, these two URIs are equivalent. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
