On 2/10/16 1:58 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Fair enough. But it seems a bit schizophrenic of this particular implementation to
apply the 'lr" grammar strictly, but then consume the route set anyway (as
indicated by improper inclusion of Route headers from B in the BYE), albeit not
actually follow it properly.
Perhaps. I would need to study in more detail what happened before
rendering judgement. (And I doubt there is any value in doing so.)
Charitably, it may have been an attempt to apply Postel's Maxim, but
maybe in an inconsistent way at two different points in the code.
(That is a big problem with Postel's Maxim - if there is more than one
way to be forgiving then it can lead to chaos.)
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
