The placement of the tag parameter within the ACK is incorrect; however it could have been caused by incorrect tag placement within the 2xx. Look at the angle bracket.
Notice that the BYE has the tag outside of bracket and ACK had the tag inside of bracket. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Nahum Nir > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 5:32 AM > To: sip-implementors > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Please Help With This BYE > > Hi All, > > I am trying to send BYE and the server sends 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does > Not Exist. I am debugging my client with x-lite on another device. When the > x-lite client sends bye it comes fine. > Below is the ACK and the BYE that my client send. > Thanks for any help, > Nir > > > ACK sip:[email protected]:30034 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 96.31.94.111;branch=z9hG4bKcydzigwkX > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.107:3998 > ;received=5.102.205.87;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z- > 1ba4c652b644c471-1---d8754z-;rport=3998 > Max-Forwards: 16 > Contact: <sip:[email protected]:3998;transport=udp> > To: <sip:[email protected];tag=u7r8s98mdo> > From: "1001"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=0cffa616 > Call-ID: NzYyZGZhMWVkNzI5YzU1MGNkN2E4Y2I2ODQ4YjI5MTA > CSeq: 1 ACK > User-Agent: X-Lite 4.7.1 74247-ddd24224-W6.2 > Content-Length: 0 > P-hint: outbound > > > BYE sip:[email protected]:3998;transport=udp SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.105:30034 > ;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-b51c707ac7dc8b0a-1--- > d8754z-;rport > Max-Forwards: 70 > Route: <sip:96.31.94.111;lr;nat=yes> > Contact: <sip:[email protected]:30034> > To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=0cffa616 > From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=u7r8s98mdo > Call-ID: NzYyZGZhMWVkNzI5YzU1MGNkN2E4Y2I2ODQ4YjI5MTA > CSeq: 2 BYE > Content-Length: 0 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
