Hi,

And for completeness, RFC 2396 section 3 indicates the following.

"URI that do not make use of the slash "/" character for separating
hierarchical components are considered opaque by the generic URI
parser."

I mention it since some attempt to fit the sip-uri as a hier_part.

absoluteURI   = scheme ":" ( hier_part | opaque_part )
opaque_part   = uric_no_slash *uric


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Tate [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 4:10 PM
> To: 'Doug Sauder'; 'sip-implementors'
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] SIP URI syntax vs. generic URI syntax
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> If I recall correctly, the conclusion of the following thread was that
nobody
> cares about fixing any of the existing incompatibilities.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg26318.html
>
> The following email shows why it might be valid (i.e. structured subset
of
> opaque_part of RFC 2396 absoluteURI).
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg26325.html
>
> The following RFC 2396 section 3.1 snippet may be of interest.
>
> "The URI syntax consists of a sequence of components separated by
reserved
> characters, with the first component defining the semantics for the
remainder
> of the URI string."
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Sauder
> > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 2:51 PM
> > To: sip-implementors
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP URI syntax vs. generic URI syntax
> >
> > The SIP URI syntax in RFC 3261 is not compatible with the generic URI
> > syntax in RFC 3986.  Specifically, the character "?" should not appear
> > in the user component. Arguably, the character "/"
> > also should not appear in the user component.
> >
> > Surely this topic must have been discussed before now. Does anyone
> > have information about prior discussions, or other comments on this
> > topic? Has there been a previous attempt to make the SIP URI syntax
> > compatible with the generic URI syntax?
> >
> > Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to