Hi Paul,
Wrong P-Asserted Identity means the one which was not in the list of
P-Associated URI.I am not sure
whether to send 403 since i couldn't get the reference of exact behavior in
the RFC.
Thanks and Regards,
Sunil
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 14:35:30 -0400
> From: Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe
> Message to CSCF
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Sunil,
>
> What do you mean by "wrong"?
>
> This is used with transitive trust, so presumably you should trust the
> sender to have asserted the correct identity of the sender.
>
> Do you mean that this identity is not authorized to make the
> subscription it is requesting? If so, then I guess the proper response
> is 403 Forbidden.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On 7/20/14 2:07 PM, Sunil P wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What should be the behavior of CSCF if it receives Subscribe
> > request from UE
> > with wrong P-Asserted Identity header?.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Sunil
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:17:44 +0800
> From: "=?gb18030?B?U2FtbWFu?=" <[email protected]>
> To: "=?gb18030?B?TmVlbGFrYW50YW4sIE5lZWw=?="
> <[email protected]>, "=?gb18030?B?UHJha2FzaCBL?="
> <[email protected]>,
>
> "=?gb18030?B?c2lwLWltcGxlbWVudG9yc0BsaXN0cy5jcy5jb2x1bWJpYS5lZHU=?="
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Message Body in ACK other than SDP
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb18030"
>
> please Refer to RFC3264
>
>
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From: "Neelakantan, Neel"<[email protected]>;
> Date: 2014?7?18?(???) ??11:19
> To: "Prakash K"<[email protected]>; "
> [email protected]"<
> [email protected]>;
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Message Body in ACK other than SDP
>
>
>
> The ACK can have a message body, if the Offer/Answer is done in 200
> OK/ACK. The offer/answer can have multipart-mime message body. In that
> case, ACK can have multipart-mime body (with embedded SDP).
>
> Thanks,
> Neel.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Prakash K
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:58 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Message Body in ACK other than SDP
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is there any usecase or standards/RFC define that ACK method can carry
> > Message body otherthan SDP
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> > Prakash K
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:56:32 +0530
> From: Raghavendra D P <[email protected]>
> To: Sunil P <[email protected]>,
> "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe
> Message to CSCF
> Message-ID:
> <
> 84dd18eec80aa5439fcf0741b858002d912bcf6...@sinchnmbx001.techmahindra.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Sunil,
> P-Asserted identity is added by P-CSCF not the UE.
> UE adds P-Preferred Identity in SIP Request , P-CSCF using this
> information P-CSCF adds P-Asserted Identity header.
>
> Regards
> Raghavendra DP
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Sunil P
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 11:37 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe Message
> to CSCF
>
> Hi All,
>
> What should be the behavior of CSCF if it receives Subscribe
> request from UE with wrong P-Asserted Identity header?.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sunil
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
>
> ============================================================================================================================
> Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is
> proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy
> statement, you may review the policy at
> http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally
> http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within
> TechMahindra.
>
> ============================================================================================================================
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:41:26 +0530
> From: Sunil P <[email protected]>
> To: Raghavendra D P <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe
> Message to CSCF
> Message-ID:
> <
> cahfffazofizx0q5eicqtf81dlzazicaskxavhgmaerq684g...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Raghavendra,
>
> UAC can add P-ASSERTED Identity.Please refer RFC 5876.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sunil
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Raghavendra D P <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sunil,
> > P-Asserted identity is added by P-CSCF not the UE.
> > UE adds P-Preferred Identity in SIP Request , P-CSCF using this
> > information P-CSCF adds P-Asserted Identity header.
> >
> > Regards
> > Raghavendra DP
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Sunil P
> > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 11:37 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe
> Message
> > to CSCF
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What should be the behavior of CSCF if it receives Subscribe
> > request from UE with wrong P-Asserted Identity header?.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Sunil
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ============================================================================================================================
> >
> > Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is
> > proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy
> > statement, you may review the policy at
> > http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally
> > http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within
> > TechMahindra.
> >
> >
> >
> ============================================================================================================================
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:18:21 +0530
> From: Pranav Damele <[email protected]>
> To: Sunil P <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Wrong P-Asserted Identity in Subscribe
> Message to CSCF
> Message-ID:
> <
> camae1vjt6emwxsxlctv6cm8njs-kmndmyhz9g91ghrkgn7-...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hey Sunil,
>
> It will remove the incoming PAID header and then will insert PAID header
> based on AOR match.
> I think it will do regardless the incoming PAID is correct or not
> (according to PUI in 200 OK received at the time of UE's Registration).
>
> Regards,
> Pranav Damele
>
> Associate Consultant - Engineering, Product Engineering and Development
> *Mobile:* +91-9818-92-4466
> *Email:* [email protected]
> *IM:* pranavdamele (Skype)
> *http://in.linkedin.com/in/pranavdamele
> <http://in.linkedin.com/in/pranavdamele>*
>
>
> On 20 July 2014 23:37, Sunil P <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What should be the behavior of CSCF if it receives Subscribe
> > request from UE
> > with wrong P-Asserted Identity header?.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Sunil
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
> End of Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 5, Issue 20
> ***********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
