RFC 3325/3324. I don't think this scenario is directly mentioned, because it's silly, but it's valid according to the ABNF.
Joel Gerber Network Specialist Network Operations Eastlink E: [email protected] T: 519.786.1241 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rajesh Sent: July-02-14 12:30 PM To: abhishek verma; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Thanks Abhishek. Could you please send me any references on this from RFCs and i would really appreciate if you can mention any scenario where we can see PAI header with anonymous URI Regards Rajesh On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:18 PM, abhishek verma <[email protected]> wrote: > It is valid > > > On Wednesday, 2 July 2014, Rajesh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> May i know whether it is valid to add Anonymous URI ( >> [email protected]) in the PAI (P-Asserted-Identity) header >> filed. >> Thanks >> >> Regards >> Rajesh >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >> > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
