Thanks Paul!
At first I thought automaton as a typo too, but I found out that the most recent RFC7088 also use automaton instead of automata, that's why I asked the question. ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Paul Kyzivat";<[email protected]>; Date: Tue, Apr 29, 2014 08:35 PM To: "sip-implementors"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] A question about the automaton feature tag I presume "automaton" is simply an error - a misspelling. You can look in the iana registry for all the defined feature tags. On 4/29/14 3:27 AM, SIP Learner wrote: > Hi, guys! > > > I am reading RFC5359 for SIP services examples, some of the message examples > contain a Contact header parameter like the following: > > > Contact: <sips:[email protected]>;automaton > ;+sip.byeless;+sip.rendering="no" > > > > FRC5359 states that the automaton feature tag is defined in RFC3840, but > RFC3840 actually defined sip.automata instead of automaon. > > > What is the difference between automaton and sip.automata anyway? Are they > equivalent or are they different? > > > Thanks a lot! > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors . _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
