Hey Sippers, 

I would like to get everyones option on the interpretation of how to select 
transport protocol in rfc3261/3. 

It mainly concerns the issue of when to allow rfc3261's rule of "if bigger than 
1300, use reliable transport", over-ride the rules of rfc3263. 

Since I've always been of the persuasion that I want to avoid IP fragmentation 
as much as possible, I've always considered the 1300-rule to override NAPTR 
priorities, but discussions have made me realize that the text in rfc3263 which 
refers to this rule, is referenced regarding to scenarios with the URI 
containing IP address and/or port. 

So the simple question is, should the message size over-ride NAPTR priorities? 
Is the rfc3261 rule of chapter 18.1.1 more "important" or not? 

Additionally, can you see any useful scenario of using SAME priority NAPTRs for 
your supported transport protocols? 

Best Regards 
Taisto Qvist 
(S)IP Teacher and Developer 

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to