Adelia,
The problem is that carriers and other intermediaries have decided that
they are free to change anything they want in sip signaling, regardless
of SIP spec rules that they not do so. So you will have to take it up
with them.
It appears to me that the general attitude is: we will allow what we
must to make the specific features we care about work - breaking any
usage we don't explicitly embrace is a feature rather than a bug.
Thanks,
Paul
On 1/29/14 4:48 PM, Adelia Chetreanu wrote:
> I need to send a 10 digit unique ID over the network.
> I've been doing it for years by replacing the INVITE FROM header with the 10
> digit value.
> Looks like a phone number.
>
> Lately, I'm facing an on/off problem, the ANI gets replaced with Anonymous
> every 70-80 calls or so. Randomly, no pattern.
> I believe it to be related to a particular carrier we traverse and I have no
> control over it.
> It breaks one of our major features.
>
> This is an example:
>
> Sending:
> INVITE sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 10.10.10.2:5060;received=10.10.10.2;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-603a7a3e7269fb4d-1--d87543-;rport=5060
> Max-Forwards: 69
> Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp>
> To: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp>
> From: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp;isup-oli=00>;tag=2b5d3157
> Call-ID: MzQ3NzFjNGQ1NjY1MDBmNjMxMDAyOTA0NWVhNjVmNzc.
> CSeq: 1 INVITE
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 186
>
> Receiving:
>
>
>
>
> Request URI: sip:[email protected]:5060
> From: "Anonymous" <sip:[email protected];isup-oli=0>;tag=gK0a240fff
> To: <sip:[email protected]:5060>
> Call-ID:
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> CSeq: 20798 INVITE
> Contact: "Anonymous" <sip:[email protected]:5060>
> P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:[email protected]:5060>
>
>
> We extract 4153436545 instead of 5180943774 on the called party side, and our
> feature bombs.
>
> While I follow up with our carrier, what other options do I have?
> What could I use (header or parameter) to send my private info transparently
> through the network?
> Must be in INVITE.
>
> I have found post "Private Header" from 2009, that suggests:
> - private header, add your own
> - MIME data
> - userinfo parameter in Request URI
>
> Each one has its challenges for my app - do I have other options?
> Thank you!
> A.C.
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
