UA should ignore unexpected headers in the response. As UA is the final destination it of no use in removing it. But still you should never remove a Header but should ignore (Proxy, UA....) it unless there is reason for that .
-----Original Message----- From: Rakshit Malhotra [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 10:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding the handling of Resource-Priority header Hi I have a query regarding the handling of Resource-Priority header in SIP messages. RFC 4412 says that the header should only come in Request messages. As per Section 20 of RFC 3261, any header or extension which is unknown must be "ignored". We have a UA which understands Resource-Priority header (it is a known header). If it receives a Resource-Priority header in a response, what should be the expected behavior: - Whether the UA should remove the header from the response? - Or the UA should simple ignore the header and not remove it? Thanks Rakshit =============================================================================== Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
