See inline..

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Keerthi Srinivasan <
[email protected]> wrote:

> All,
>
> Can anyone help in unknown transport in Via Header
>
> 1. If the Proxy / Registrar received the below message.
>
>       OPTIONS sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
>       To: sip:[email protected]
>       From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=323
>       Max-Forwards: 70
>       Call-ID:  transports.kijh4akdnaqjkwendsasfdj
>       Accept: application/sdp
>       CSeq: 60 OPTIONS
> *      Via: SIP/2.0/UNKNOWN t4.example.com;branch=z9hG4bKasd0f3en*
>       l: 0
>
> What could be the response?
>


"RFC 3261, Section 25.1 Basic Rules" defines the transport as one of the
following:
-------------------------
transport         =  "UDP" / "TCP" / "TLS" / "SCTP"
                     / other-transport
-------------------------

Therefore it is possible that other transports will appear in the Via
header. But weather UAS does understands them is a different question. In
case if it doesn't I guess it should return an error (i.e. 400) with
further explanation that transport is not supported?



>
> 2. If the Proxy / Registrar received the below message.
>
>
>       OPTIONS sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
>       To: sip:[email protected]
>       From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=323
>       Max-Forwards: 70
>       Call-ID:  transports.kijh4akdnaqjkwendsasfdj
>       Accept: application/sdp
>       CSeq: 60 OPTIONS
> *       Via: UNKNOWN/2.0/UDP t4.example.com;branch=z9hG4bKasd0f3en*
>       l: 0
>
> What could be the response?
>
>


"RFC 3261, Section 8.1.1.7 Via" reads the following:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When the UAC creates a request, it MUST insert a Via into that
   request.  The protocol name and protocol version in the header field
   MUST be SIP and 2.0, respectively.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So the request you presented is non SIP version 2 compliant, therefore UAS
should again return an error as in the case above?


Regards,

Brez
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to