Thanks Alok and Brett for your quick reply

On 5/10/12, Alok 2 Tiwari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Pranab,
> As per RFC 3261- section 12.2.1.1 Generating the Request
>
> Requests within a dialog MUST contain strictly monotonically
>    increasing and contiguous CSeq sequence numbers (increasing-by-one)
>    in each direction (excepting ACK and CANCEL of course, whose numbers
>    equal the requests being acknowledged or cancelled).  Therefore, if
>    the local sequence number is not empty, the value of the local
>    sequence number MUST be incremented by one, and this value MUST be
>    placed into the CSeq header field.  If the local sequence number is
>    empty, an initial value MUST be chosen using the guidelines of
>    Section 8.1.1.5.
>
> In your scenario,A sends Invite to B to keep B on hold with Incremented
> CSeq.
>
> Regards,
> Alok Tiwari
> Aricent
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pranab
> sahoo
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: sip-implementors
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] query in sip
>
> Hi all,
>
>         I have a doubt on cseq.
> Lets consider a case
>
>        INVITE
> A---------------------->B
>       180 Ringing
> A<----------------------B
>        200ok
> A<---------------------->B
> again A sends Invite to B to keep B on hold.
> IS in this case there is increment in cseq value or it will same as
> previous one?
> What will be cseq value if B sends Invite to A?
> In RFC 5359 I checked cseq value which remain same in  Invite(hold).
> But in some voip product like Ekiga there is increment in cseq in
> Invite(hold).
> Can anybody help in this regards?
> Waiting for quick clarification.
>
> thanks and regards
> pranab
> Brazil
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
>
>
> ===============================================================================
> Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
> for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
> ===============================================================================
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to