I did not receive any response to this email so I'm resending it with a more explicit subject.
Meantime I have also noticed that some of the examples in section 12.2.2 of RFC6086 contain multiple content-length header fields and I'm therefore wondering whether this should be considered an error! [Sip-implementors] Doubt on MIME body [RFC-3204] [email protected] bruno.chatras at orange.com <mailto:sip-implementors%40lists.cs.columbia.edu?Subject=%5BSip-implemen tors%5D%20Doubt%20on%20MIME%20body%20%20%5BRFC-3204%5D&In-Reply-To=> Mon Mar 5 11:18:32 EST 2012 ________________________________ Hello, I have some doubts about the use of the Content-Length when a sip message contains a multi-part body. A previous and quite old discussion on this mailing list has clarified that the Content-Length associated with the "Content-Type = multipart/mixed" tells the length of the complete body of the sip message. https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2008-March/0187 89.html However, I have recently eared different opinions as to whether additional Content-Length header fields may also be associated to individual parts of the multi-part body and inserted between the different parts. I don't see any need for adding such fields but I'm wondering whether doing that should even be considered an error? Best Regards, BC . _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
