> From: Kevin P. Fleming [[email protected]] > > Well... pedantically, the request to Contact 1 *may* receive a response, > if the DHCP server in question has reassigned the address within the > expiration time of the registration and the device at that address > happens to have a SIP UA listening on the port specified in the Contact > URI :-) In that case, I'd expect the fork of the INVITE that went to > Contact 1 to result in a '404' response.
Good point. Which reminds us that UAs shouldn't register a contact that is just an IP address (sip:10.1.1.1), as that's too likely to be accidentally reused by another UA. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
