On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:47:45AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:37:59PM +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > Bump up evdev driver to 65, so it get's perferred over libipnut,
> > which was dropped down to 60. Reason is, that evdev driver is more
> > of an additional driver, w
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:37:59PM +0200, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> Bump up evdev driver to 65, so it get's perferred over libipnut,
> which was dropped down to 60. Reason is, that evdev driver is more
> of an additional driver, which likely won't be installed by default
> on a system any longer. But
Bump up evdev driver to 65, so it get's perferred over libipnut,
which was dropped down to 60. Reason is, that evdev driver is more
of an additional driver, which likely won't be installed by default
on a system any longer. But if it is installed it should also be
used, i.e. preferred over libinput
