On 07/29/2013 08:19 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
Slaving two outputs on a secondary GPU to a primary GPU testing
picked this up, in that we'd try to resize to the totally the
wrong thing, then as usual segfault in the rotation code.
This never got applied, did it?
Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner
Sign
Em 03/05/2014 14:02, "Keith Packard" escreveu:
> You should use XParseGeometry or even XWMGeometry. If you want to avoid
> Xlib, you should hack those functions into something that could be
> included in an xcb utility library (probably util-wm).
>
> I couldn't find anything suitable in xcb yet, b
Laércio de Sousa writes:
> OK. One last question: for negative values, should it support WxH-X-Y
> syntax (harder to implement) or just WxH+-X+-Y syntax (easier to
> implement)?
You should use XParseGeometry or even XWMGeometry. If you want to avoid
Xlib, you should hack those functions into som
Em 02/05/2014 14:50, "Keith Packard" escreveu:
>
> Laércio de Sousa writes:
>
> > Some time ago I submitted another patch with the following approach:
extend
> > kdrive -screen option parsing to include strings like WxH+X+Y, and then
> > place Xephyr window top-left corner at (X,Y). Do you think
