On 23 September 2013 21:05, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Henri Verbeet writes:
>
>> ---
>> dlls/wined3d/device.c | 51
>> +
>> dlls/wined3d/stateblock.c |5 +
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> It doesn't work here:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2313
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2314
Your paranoid andr
The failure is not caused by the error from my patch,Isn't it?
It seems that the number 2232.
Original Message
Subject:Re: add ualapi directory (try 9
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 04:02:32 -0500
From: Marvin
To: matyapir...@gmail.com
CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
H
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2315
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2316
Your paranoid andr
Any help for this?
--
I'm testing support for GetConsoleScreenBufferInfoEx.
At the moment, I've extended the screen_buffer struct in server/console.c to
look like this:
struct screen_buffer
{
struct object obj;
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2317
Your paranoid andr
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2318
Your paranoid andr
Thanks, Dan.
No. I already have that virus sample file.
For the more fun, W32:Tenga (aka Virus:Win32/Gael.D) virus behavior
signature under Wine 1.7.1 attached.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Thanks, looks like you're doing good work there.
> (Are you going to ask the guy
Am 24.09.2013 17:13, schrieb Huw Davies:
> ---
> configure.ac| 1 +
> server/ptrace.c | 8 +++-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
is that for the warning about the missing casts?
> On 24 Sep 2013, at 17:57, André Hentschel wrote:
>
> is that for the warning about the missing casts?
No, this actually introduces more :-)
The cast warning is about the 4th param of ptrace.
Huw.
Aric Stewart writes:
> @@ -443,6 +473,28 @@ static InputContextData* get_imc_data(HIMC hIMC)
> return data;
> }
>
> +static BOOL ensure_default_imc(IMMThreadData** thread_data)
> +{
> +if (!(*thread_data)->defaultContext)
> +{
> +HIMC defaultContext;
> +LeaveCritic
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2330
Your paranoid andr
14 matches
Mail list logo