Dan Kegel writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Explicit ok() calls are better than hiding them inside a macro.
>
> Uh-oh. Want me to get rid of this macro
>
> +#define CHECK_RET_ERRNO(ret, ex) \
> +do { \
> +ok(ret == ex, "ret is %d, expected %d\n", ret, ex); \
> +ok(errno
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Explicit ok() calls are better than hiding them inside a macro.
Uh-oh. Want me to get rid of this macro
+#define CHECK_RET_ERRNO(ret, ex) \
+do { \
+ok(ret == ex, "ret is %d, expected %d\n", ret, ex); \
+ok(errno == ex, "errno is %d, expected %d\n"
Nikolay Sivov writes:
> @@ -350,34 +353,47 @@ static void test_reader_create(void)
> HRESULT hr;
> IXmlReader *reader;
> IUnknown *input;
> +DtdProcessing dtd;
>
> /* crashes native */
> if (0)
> {
> pCreateXmlReader(&IID_IXmlReader, NULL, NULL);
> -
