Re: wrc vs IDC_STATIC

2003-12-19 Thread Ferenc Wagner
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On December 18, 2003 09:10 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> wrc does not seem to grok IDC_STATIC. Isn't it supposed to >> work out of the box? It is defined to -1 in the MinGW >> headers. > > Nothing to do with wrc, make sure you include . Ah. I wa

Re: wrc vs IDC_STATIC

2003-12-18 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 18, 2003 09:10 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > wrc does not seem to grok IDC_STATIC. Isn't it supposed to > work out of the box? It is defined to -1 in the MinGW > headers. Nothing to do with wrc, make sure you include . -- Dimi.

wrc vs IDC_STATIC

2003-12-18 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Hello, wrc does not seem to grok IDC_STATIC. Isn't it supposed to work out of the box? It is defined to -1 in the MinGW headers. Sorry if I'm talking nonsense, first steps in Win32 GUI programming... Feri.