Re: working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-09 Thread Misha Koshelev
Okay, I have an implementation that I like now, and so I'll send it out to wine-patches when I can get my ObtainUserAgentString patches in. On the plus side the WINEDEBUG=+wininet matches very very closely now between my implementation and native (pretty much exactly for the querydataavailable/read

Re: working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-09 Thread Misha Koshelev
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 00:45 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote: > I have its incomplete implementation since about 1,5 years, but your > version seems to be about as functional as mine. The reason I didn't > finish it is that I went the native way and wininet is quite not yet > ready for it (it doesn't handl

Re: working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-08 Thread Misha Koshelev
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 00:45 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote: > Hi Misha, > > Misha Koshelev wrote: > > Just wanted to let y'all know (so hopefully I'm not duplicating any > > effort) I'm working on an HttpProtocol implementation for urlmon (Vector > > NTI has a bug that requires POST to work for url moni

Re: working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-08 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi Misha, Misha Koshelev wrote: > Just wanted to let y'all know (so hopefully I'm not duplicating any > effort) I'm working on an HttpProtocol implementation for urlmon (Vector > NTI has a bug that requires POST to work for url monikers, and I don't > want to submit patches to a function that has

working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-08 Thread Misha Koshelev
Just wanted to let y'all know (so hopefully I'm not duplicating any effort) I'm working on an HttpProtocol implementation for urlmon (Vector NTI has a bug that requires POST to work for url monikers, and I don't want to submit patches to a function that has _hack at the end of it :) ). Right now I