On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 11:43 +0200, Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Not to be harsh, but:
>
> Hehe ;-).
>
> I know, I was just poking, hoping to get an explanation for why James'
> particular app might be more beneficial than Process Explorer.
>
> (yes, I like Process Explorer, I us
Dan Kegel wrote:
Not to be harsh, but:
Hehe ;-).
I know, I was just poking, hoping to get an explanation for why James'
particular app might be more beneficial than Process Explorer.
(yes, I like Process Explorer, I use it for debugging from time to time.)
The optimal thing of course would b
On 8/5/06, Molle Bestefich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
> I'd rather have 5 more apps installing, than one app working
> (and it's Process Explorer of all things).
Who are you to say which apps are important and which aren't?...
Not to be harsh, but:
http://cia.navi.cx/stat
James Hawkins wrote:
I'd rather have 5 more apps installing, than one app working
(and it's Process Explorer of all things).
Who are you to say which apps are important and which aren't?...
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Indeed, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to kill all comment annotations
in the pr
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 01:21:57PM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
> My reasoning for reverting the change is that I'd rather have 5 more
> apps installing, than one app working (and it's Process Explorer of
> all things).
Indeed, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to kill all comment annotations
