Re: [PATCH 07/11] Revert "winmm: Test opening the same device twice."

2009-10-12 Thread Robert Reif
Alexandre Julliard wrote: Ken Thomases writes: This reverts commit 6a7127bfc201ff7a218795c239d5b2571ea413d7 and part of 9f32c0d9d60662ac8e00ce5cbd4aebd4fdf8dc89. It turns out that the issue isn't a limitation of winmm. It's just individual low-level drivers that may fail to support openin

Re: [PATCH 07/11] Revert "winmm: Test opening the same device twice."

2009-10-12 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Ken Thomases writes: > This reverts commit 6a7127bfc201ff7a218795c239d5b2571ea413d7 and part of > 9f32c0d9d60662ac8e00ce5cbd4aebd4fdf8dc89. > > It turns out that the issue isn't a limitation of winmm. It's just > individual low-level drivers that may fail to support opening the device > twice.

Re: winmm: Test opening the same device twice

2008-08-19 Thread Robert Reif
Eric Pouech wrote: > Maarten Lankhorst a écrit : > >> Behavioral test to show that wine winmm needs fixing. >> --- >> >> >> >> > this likely is going to fail on old boxes > there's no requirement on MS side that a PCM

Re: winmm: Test opening the same device twice

2008-08-19 Thread Eric Pouech
Maarten Lankhorst a écrit : > Behavioral test to show that wine winmm needs fixing. > --- > > > this likely is going to fail on old boxes there's no requirement on MS side that a PCM renderer has to be opened twice so having i