Re: wininet file scheme

2006-06-18 Thread Nick Cronin
I think your right Travis, there is a difference however I'm not removing it per-say.  If file:// is sent, InternetCrackUrl does not take out the %xx ascii values, however if file:/// is sent, it does.  I've added a test case for these both.  I also wrote a test case for http:/// which currently t

Re: wininet file scheme

2006-06-16 Thread Travis Watkins
On 6/16/06, Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nick Cronin wrote: > unlike http:// etc, file:/// has 3 slashes, this patch removes the third > slash. Could you provide a test case for this please? Specifically, is "http:///foo.bar"; different to "http://foo.bar";? Your code treats them

Re: wininet file scheme

2006-06-16 Thread Mike McCormack
Nick Cronin wrote: unlike http:// etc, file:/// has 3 slashes, this patch removes the third slash. Could you provide a test case for this please? Specifically, is "http:///foo.bar"; different to "http://foo.bar";? Your code treats them equally. How about "file:///" and "file://"? Mike