Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not? It's a bug fix and four places to fix sounds quite reasonable
> (>100 may not be). Maybe it's just me but I didn't feel like 1.0 would
> entail a deep deep freeze period where only critical/security bugs would
> be fixed.
At this point the
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2008 17:09:52 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
> > The bug is in InternetCrackUrlW, it shouldn't require the string to be
> > null-terminated.
>
> Right, but I guess fixing that is no 1.0 material since there's at least
> 4 places where i
On Monday 09 June 2008 17:09:52 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> The bug is in InternetCrackUrlW, it shouldn't require the string to be
> null-terminated.
Right, but I guess fixing that is no 1.0 material since there's at least
4 places where it assumes a null-terminated string, including a call to
In
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1968
> as well as a bunch of Valgrind warnings in the url test module.
>
> -Hans
>
> Changelog
> Make sure URL is terminated in InternetCrackUrlA.
The bug is in InternetCrackUrlW, it shouldn't require the