Re: wininet: Implement IsDomainLegalCookieDomainW.

2009-01-29 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Thursday 29 January 2009 17:51:26 Juan Lang wrote: > > No, we should have a warning because the algorithm is unknown and the > > tests are not exhaustive. > > Fair enough. This is an implementation of the same origin policy, > yes? Wikipedia provides some interesting examples, for instance,

Re: wininet: Implement IsDomainLegalCookieDomainW.

2009-01-29 Thread Juan Lang
> No, we should have a warning because the algorithm is unknown and the > tests are not exhaustive. Fair enough. This is an implementation of the same origin policy, yes? Wikipedia provides some interesting examples, for instance, having different port numbers in the same domain can cause a mism

Re: wininet: Implement IsDomainLegalCookieDomainW.

2009-01-29 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Thursday 29 January 2009 17:18:35 Juan Lang wrote: > +FIXME("(%s, %s)\n", debugstr_w(s1), debugstr_w(s2)); > > Shouldn't that be TRACE? No, we should have a warning because the algorithm is unknown and the tests are not exhaustive. -Hans

Re: wininet: Implement IsDomainLegalCookieDomainW.

2009-01-29 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Hans, minor point: +FIXME("(%s, %s)\n", debugstr_w(s1), debugstr_w(s2)); Shouldn't that be TRACE? --Juan