On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 12:59 -0800, Juan Lang wrote:
> > Getting the client to trust the server cert can be as easy as ignoring
> untrusted
> > root errors, if you don't think this impacts the revocation results.
> >
> > Returning revocation
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 12:59 -0800, Juan Lang wrote:
> Getting the client to trust the server cert can be as easy as ignoring
> untrusted
> root errors, if you don't think this impacts the revocation results.
>
> Returning revocation is straightforward enough, assuming you have a server
> under
>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 11:52 -0800, Juan Lang wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Hans Leidekker
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:52 +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> > > On 12/11/12 09:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> >
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 11:52 -0800, Juan Lang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:52 +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> > On 12/11/12 09:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> > > https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23300 is a te
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:52 +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> > On 12/11/12 09:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> > > https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23300 is a test which
> shows that
> > > revocation checks fail for the certificate on outl
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:52 +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> On 12/11/12 09:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> > https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23300 is a test which shows
> > that
> > revocation checks fail for the certificate on outlook.com when passed
> > straight
> > to CertVerifyRevocation
Hi Hans,
On 12/11/12 09:45, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23300 is a test which shows that
> revocation checks fail for the certificate on outlook.com when passed straight
> to CertVerifyRevocation. The reason is that a CRL link specified in the
> certificate