Mostly for fun I compiled another winetests.exe from Wine CVS
2004-03-28.
http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/
http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/regrtest.exe
I am unpatiently waiting for the Windows Testing Service, but wanted to
see how the tests have developed since January. :-)
Try it out in
http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/
Since winetests has not yet made it to CVS and I found some spare time,
I have now compiled a new winetests.exe.
Tests built with MSVC 7 from CVS 20031027.
(Testing shell cross built with mingw32.)
http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/
New build of winetests.exe with tests from CVS 2003-10-02
http://vmlinux.org/~jakov/Wine/
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
But I think we are going in the wrong direction here. This is more
part of a different project, a porting status (Steven is working on
that). Maybe we should drop all this and just focus on tests results,
it doesn't make sense to track build status just for some files here,
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Fine vision, I am sold on it, although I would like to
provide a way to make more frequent builds.
I don't have time for more detailed replies just now, but I think more
frequent builds
would be very good. Otherwise test maintainers would have a very long
turnaround time
On October 1, 2003 06:25 am, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why? The current simple scheme of setting it to the date
> should work if we do not build twice in 24 hours. If that
> is not enough, we can include a full CVS time specification
> down to seconds
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I thought the build tag (which can be any one-line string)
>> was enough. Why do we need anything else?
>
> That works nicely IF Jakob builds the tests only on official
> releases
Why? The current si
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I thought the build tag (which can be any one-line string)
> was enough. Why do we need anything else?
That works nicely IF Jakob builds the tests only on official
releases (which should happen anyway). I guess we can hope
not to do some silly things.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -- we should include in the master file and the test output
> some sort of unique identifier (a MD5 sum of sorts?) so
> we make sure we correlate the test output with the correct
> master file.
I thought the build tag (which can be
On September 29, 2003 05:31 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I did not like this idea either, but decided to go with it
> in the end. First, to generate summaries I have to
> correlate files anyway, which *is* problematic already, and
> having a master file could only make it simpler and also
> make the
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:29:48PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Tester= field should be given slightly more emphasis, and
>
> How can I add more emphasis to it?
Sorry for my vague language, is reflects my vague thoughts.
Currently, it is amongst c
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On September 27, 2003 07:42 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
>
>> Do you want a second file generated apart from the mail
>> sent to wine-tests-report? (If yes, where should this
>> file be sent?)
>
> I'm not sure I like this idea. Correlating the two fi
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:29:48PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This winetests.exe should not pop up various error
> > requesters any more, so if you click past any, please note
> > it in the comment text box.
&g
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> winetests.exe with tests from CVS 2003-09-26 can be found here:
>
> http://vmlinux.org/~jakov/Wine/
>
> This winetests.exe should not pop up various error
> requesters any more, so if you click past any, please note
> it in t
winetests.exe with tests from CVS 2003-09-26 can be found here:
http://vmlinux.org/~jakov/Wine/
(The bigger EXE size is due to tests generated from MSVC instead of MinGW.)
This winetests.exe should not pop up various error requesters any more,
so if you click past any, please note it in the
Ok people, new version. This time the tests (but not timetests.exe)
are compiled with MSVC 7 instead of crosscompiled.
(No agenda behind that decision - it's just that current CVS
is broken when it comes to crosstest.)
http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/
16 matches
Mail list logo
