On December 5, 2003 12:38 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> We could also generate a test-by-test 'average', 'worst case'
> or 'best case' mixture out of the (hopefully) several
> submissions, of course.
This is what I was hopping we're gonna do. It doesn't
seem right to pick the first one... We could t
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On December 4, 2003 08:10 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> 4. Which submission should be the principal one? The first?
>
> Why do we need a principal one in the first place?
That would be the one we show in the first table, which
contains one submiss
On December 4, 2003 08:10 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Changes needed at least:
> 1. Windows version detected automatically.
For sure. We have all this info into the results however,
shouldn't be too difficult.
> 2. Tester name and contact (?) included in the results.
Would be nice to have, but I
Hi,
so we should start working out this one, too. First let me
sketch the present picture. I've got a directory structure
like this: |
+ 20030829 + 95
| + 95_michael
| + 98
| + 98_joel
| + 98_kevin
