Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Also I think it would be cleaner to use a different rc
>> file for the dist case instead of using #ifdefs.
>
> I agree. The problem is the single-rc-file limitation,
> which would require some code dup
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a resend to elicit some feedback on your objections
> against this patch. What did I miss again?
It's much better this time. The only thing I would suggest changing is
that the build info text formatting should be done in the code, not in
the m
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I got it, hopefully. So: the winetest executable must
> contain some information about its build process which it
> can write into the reports. These are: an identification
> string (usually the checkout date and time but possible
> something else)
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Back to the topic: my main point is that the situation is
>> best expressed by a Makefile and solved by make. Best as
>> opposed to verbosity and complexity. I suppose this is also
>> a fairly workabl
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Back to the topic: my main point is that the situation is
> best expressed by a Makefile and solved by make. Best as
> opposed to verbosity and complexity. I suppose this is also
> a fairly workable scheme for those who build the winetest
> packages wh
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> My first implementation did exactly that. However, these
>> pieces of information have their places in the depencency
>> tree and I managed to screw up my build more often than not
>> without the help
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My first implementation did exactly that. However, these
> pieces of information have their places in the depencency
> tree and I managed to screw up my build more often than not
> without the help of make. Beyond that, moving this little
> complexity
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It's almost a resend of my previous patch which seems MIA.
>> The only difference is that I removed the possible sequence
>> point screwups in the hope they were the reason for the drop.
>>
>> New files
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's almost a resend of my previous patch which seems MIA.
> The only difference is that I removed the possible sequence
> point screwups in the hope they were the reason for the drop.
>
> New files: programs/winetest/README
>programs/winetes
