Re: wineserver epoll

2004-08-31 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:48:16AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Mike Hearn wrote: > > >>Building with a recent glibc and running on an older one is not > >>supported by glibc, and it won't work for many reasons having nothing > >>to do with epoll. Crossover runs everywhere because it is built >

Re: wineserver epoll

2004-08-31 Thread Mike Hearn
Details, please. How do I do that? readelf -aW /lib/libc.so.6 | grep epoll if the symbols are declared WEAK then you can do this (assuming AJ agrees). #pragma weak epoll_whatever should do the trick. In the resulting binary "readelf -aW mybinary | grep epoll" should should you the weak linkage. At

Re: wineserver epoll

2004-08-31 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Mike Hearn wrote: Building with a recent glibc and running on an older one is not supported by glibc, and it won't work for many reasons having nothing to do with epoll. Crossover runs everywhere because it is built against a very old glibc. To clarify, it is possible to build against a new glibc

Re: wineserver epoll

2004-08-31 Thread Mike Hearn
Building with a recent glibc and running on an older one is not supported by glibc, and it won't work for many reasons having nothing to do with epoll. Crossover runs everywhere because it is built against a very old glibc. To clarify, it is possible to build against a new glibc and have it run on

Re: wineserver epoll

2004-08-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After much talk, the patch seems ready for commit. Since there are many > systems with slightly older glibc that have the header but do not have > the implementation in glibc, or that have a stub implementation that is > guaranteed to fail, we are call