Re: winehq packages for Debian

2008-11-09 Thread Ben Klein
Thanks guys :) If there's still any doubt, Ubuntu packaging as as different from Debian as Mandriva or SUSE are from Red Hat. It's theoretically possible to produce packages that work for both but it's a pain to maintain. Scott can keep doing Ubuntu packages because he's well set up for it. I wil

Re: winehq packages for Debian

2008-11-09 Thread Scott Ritchie
Ubuntu packages have been up to date (uploaded within a day of release). Debian keeps falling behind because there's no easy way for me to build and test on Debian (with Ubuntu I can just upload them to launchpad and have it work). Thanks, Scott Ritchie Andrew Fenn wrote: > So your plan is to ta

Re: winehq packages for Debian

2008-11-09 Thread Scott Ritchie
Ben Klein wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm a regular volunteer in the #winehq IRC channel (man_in_shack). Some > of you may know me :) I also maintain a few applications on AppDB and > have had a couple of bugs found and fixed via bugzilla posts. > > I've been building Wine packages for my Debian system

Re: winehq packages for Debian

2008-11-09 Thread Andrew Fenn
So your plan is to take over Debian packaging while abandoning Ubuntu packaging? You already mentioned he has abandoned packaging (however I see new packages created on 8th November) Is there some technical reason you can't do Ubuntu Debs? I am trying to understand what is different from Ubuntu a

winehq packages for Debian

2008-11-09 Thread Ben Klein
Hi guys, I'm a regular volunteer in the #winehq IRC channel (man_in_shack). Some of you may know me :) I also maintain a few applications on AppDB and have had a couple of bugs found and fixed via bugzilla posts. I've been building Wine packages for my Debian systems for a while and now I've writ