On March 2, 2004 2:19 am, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> I think that from this point of view it is desirable to add the options to
> generated Makefiles, or at least do some checking for them
> (this was done originally).
Yes. I just wanted to know where is the proper place for them.
If MinGW have them
1 Март 2004 10:13, Dimitrie O. Paun написал:
> On March 1, 2004 1:50 am, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > And what about next (removed from winemaker by your recent patch)
> > -fpermissive,
> > -fms-extensions
> > -fno-for-scope
> > ?
> >
> > They are very handy when porting win32 apps.
>
> Are these by d
On March 1, 2004 1:50 am, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> And what about next (removed from winemaker by your recent patch)
> -fpermissive,
> -fms-extensions
> -fno-for-scope
> ?
>
> They are very handy when porting win32 apps.
Are these by default turned on on MinGW's gcc? If so,
I'll add them. If not, y
1 Март 2004 05:52, Dimitrie O. Paun написал:
> OK, this is it. I've included the new config.h.in for
> patch review convenience. Please run
>
> autoheader
> autoconf
>
> after applying it. With this stuff in the tree, we should
> be able to build programs/* with it. Next on the list is
> -shared su
