Re: winecfg in 640x480

2005-07-31 Thread Oliver Stieber
--- Joseph Garvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesse Allen wrote: > > >That's managed, not desktop. Right? =) If it's not managed and in > >the desktop window @ 640x480 then it's a little hard to reach the OK > >with the mouse cursor. > > > >I actually use TWM, and it allows the same thing, a

Re: winecfg in 640x480

2005-07-31 Thread Joseph Garvin
Jesse Allen wrote: That's managed, not desktop. Right? =) If it's not managed and in the desktop window @ 640x480 then it's a little hard to reach the OK with the mouse cursor. I actually use TWM, and it allows the same thing, at least according to my twmrc. Pretty sure just about every

Re: winecfg in 640x480

2005-07-28 Thread Jesse Allen
On 7/28/05, Joe Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/28/05, Oliver Stieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I know this isn't going to be too big an issue with many people but it > would be nice if winecfg > was usable with a 640x480 desktop, at the moment > it's 20 or so pixels to tall an

Re: winecfg in 640x480

2005-07-28 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Joe Baker wrote: Well, in KDE use the Alt key and the left mouse to click and drag the window from anywhere in the window to move it higher. I think that blackbox supports this style of Window movement as well if you're on a lighter resource computer as your resolution suggests. This doesn't

Re: winecfg in 640x480

2005-07-28 Thread Jesse Allen
On 7/28/05, Oliver Stieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this isn't going to be too big an issue with many people but it would > be nice if winecfg > was usable with a 640x480 desktop, at the moment it's 20 or so pixels to tall > and you can't see > the ok/cancel buttons. > > I agree, al

winecfg in 640x480

2005-07-28 Thread Oliver Stieber
I know this isn't going to be too big an issue with many people but it would be nice if winecfg was usable with a 640x480 desktop, at the moment it's 20 or so pixels to tall and you can't see the ok/cancel buttons. _