Andrew Eikum wrote:
>This [lock-less] seems to be the main goal of the patch.
It'll not be bad to fix the capture bug independently.
>and maybe we can get that into Wine after the next release?
That requires agreement on the lock-less protocol.
Basis: atomic 32bit updates.
Do we want distinguish
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:01:29PM +0100, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
wrote:
> Furthermore, this patch eases integration of my lock-less code, which
> I'll not release for now, by cleanly separating read and write
> pointers during playback and capture. No more adding of two volatile
> entit
