On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:03, Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig
wrote:
> Regarding:
>
> 5.5.4. Standalone, using the Microsoft C++ Toolkit
>
> of
>
> http://www.winehq.org/docs/winedev-guide/testing-windows :
>
>
>
> I tried to compile dlls/rasapi32/test/rasapi.c on Windows
>
> and got these error mess
Regarding:
5.5.4. Standalone, using the Microsoft C++ Toolkit
of
http://www.winehq.org/docs/winedev-guide/testing-windows :
I tried to compile dlls/rasapi32/test/rasapi.c on Windows
and got these error messages:
Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 15.00.30729.01
for 8
El 22/02/10 12:41, Austin English escribió:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
I have a VB6 application that requires oledb32 to convert from
DBTYPE_VARIANT to DBTYPE_BYTES, and fails with builtin oledb32 since
conversions to DBTYPE_BYTES are unimplemented. I set
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
> I have a VB6 application that requires oledb32 to convert from
> DBTYPE_VARIANT to DBTYPE_BYTES, and fails with builtin oledb32 since
> conversions to DBTYPE_BYTES are unimplemented. I set up a VirtualBox VM with
> Windows XP and the
I have a VB6 application that requires oledb32 to convert from
DBTYPE_VARIANT to DBTYPE_BYTES, and fails with builtin oledb32 since
conversions to DBTYPE_BYTES are unimplemented. I set up a VirtualBox VM
with Windows XP and the latest Cygwin in order to add a oledb32 test to
show me what should
Oh, I've also updated http://wiki.winehq.org/UnitTestSuites to reflect
this progress.
http://kegel.com/wine/chromium/ now has
a precompiled tarball containing 13 of
chromium's test programs:
app_unittests base_unittests courgette_unittests
googleurl_unittests ipc_tests media_unittests
net_unittests printing_unittests sbox_unittests
sbox_validation_tests setup_unittests tcmalloc_
Hi,
looking at the different mailing lists of wine on
http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo, I found
that wine-tests-results seems only filled with garbage (actually "[ERROR]
winetest error report").
Has that list any use these days?
Frédéric
Hey folks,
the chromium project has a very nice unit test suite,
and the chromium team pores over it with purify and
now, on linux, valgrind to make sure everything is clean.
This makes it a rather attractive test case for Wine
even if Wine isn't really trying to run Chrome itself.
I just filed th
Hi,
I've just done 4 runs on the same machine with the same wine version
with the same test version (see
http://test.winehq.org/data/8cf8e2c60a263e0b015b36dc36c9bf83e6767aa8/#group_Wine
- the rs-f10-...).
Therefore I named the runs like:
inst - test run from a wine version with an installed w
2008/7/19 Mikołaj Zalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Where does the ../../../include\rpc.h file come from? If you are mixing
> Wine and Windows headers then conflicts are quite possible. I copy only
> wine/test.h from the Wine headers. Often, I also need a #include
> at the top of the file for it t
Where does the ../../../include\rpc.h file come from? If you are
mixing Wine and Windows headers then conflicts are quite possible. I
copy only wine/test.h from the Wine headers. Often, I also need a
#include at the top of the file for it to compile with MS
headers, but after this, it works
Hi,
I am using VS 2008 (9.0) Express in conjunction with the Vista SDK.
When compiling the tests, I get:
c:\Users\reece\wine\dlls\comctl32\tests>cl -D_X86_ -DSTANDALONE -I../../../inclu
de listview.c
Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 15.00.21022.08 for 80x86
Copyright (C) Mi
Well, I have researched a bit error code -1073741819=0xc005
This a status_no_access violation, in winetest we should say the test
crashed message
On 10/27/07, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been looking into http://test.winehq.org/
Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking into http://test.winehq.org/data/.
> And I have got a question, when i saw the test data.
> Why do some tests do not return the data about tests they haven't run/skipped.
> They spew messages something like below:
>
> mapi32:prop start dlls/ma
Hi,
I have been looking into http://test.winehq.org/data/.
And I have got a question, when i saw the test data.
Why do some tests do not return the data about tests they haven't run/skipped.
They spew messages something like below:
mapi32:prop start dlls/mapi32/tests/prop.c 1.20
mapi32:prop done
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
[...]
> But there is one test that crashes, winedebug is run automatically, does
> a backtrace and returns with return code 0 thus make won't detect it as
> error:
> /home/michi/work/wine/tools/runtest -q -P wine -M mshtml.dll -T ../../.. -p
> mshtml_te
Hello!
I was showing a little bit of schadenfreude on #winehackers that
Alexandre has now failing Wine tests on his brand new computer. So I
thought to do a full run of the Wine tests on my machine and report the
errors. Maybe Alexandre will fix this bugs too ;) while at it.
Test setup:
- 3 GHz
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 09:20 -0500, Mitchell Mebane wrote:
> I've been running the Wine test from http://test.winehq.com/data/ for
> a while now. I usually run them in batches. It suddenly struck me that
> maybe I should be restarting Windows between each test. Should I do
> this for best results, o
I've been running the Wine test from
http://test.winehq.com/data/ for a while now. I usually run them in
batches. It suddenly struck me that maybe I should be restarting
Windows between each test. Should I do this for best results, or is it
OK to run them back to back?
--Mitchell
--
I find t
So is there any reason that the MoveFileA and MoveFileW functions are
defined in dlls/kernel/path.c, but the tests for those functions are
in dlls/kernel/tests/file.c? Perhaps someone made a mistake?
Glen
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:19:17PM -0700, Glen Kaukola wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> So I'm not seeing a test for MoveFileEx at all. I wouldn't mind
> taking a stab at creating one, and for that matter for anything else I
> happen to find not being tested. Sound like a plan?
Sure, but why are you
Hi there,
So I'm not seeing a test for MoveFileEx at all. I wouldn't mind
taking a stab at creating one, and for that matter for anything else I
happen to find not being tested. Sound like a plan?
Glen
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been compiling the wine tests with visual studio 2003, and there
> are a couple errors popping up. One of the errors is that the align
> modifier is not allowed on function parameters, so most of the test
> fa
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:09:06 +0100, Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 21:46, James Hawkins wrote:
>
> > Should we reconcile the difference and remove the align from out
> > types? If not the tests won't compile with vs so I guess the other
> > option would be
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 21:46, James Hawkins wrote:
> Should we reconcile the difference and remove the align from out
> types? If not the tests won't compile with vs so I guess the other
> option would be to #pragma disable that warning. Any ideas?
The use of DECLSPEC_ALIGN(8) could be mad
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:46:51 -0600, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been compiling the wine tests with visual studio 2003, and there
> are a couple errors popping up. One of the errors is that the align
> modifier is not allowed on function param
Hi,
I've been compiling the wine tests with visual studio 2003, and there
are a couple errors popping up. One of the errors is that the align
modifier is not allowed on function parameters, so most of the test
fail to compile with wine's headers because we align most of our data
types
On our sf page we now have, under the winetest-200408071000 release, 6 copies of
the same file, same name and same size,
with the exemption of winetest-200408071000-kevin-mingw.zip that has 6 different
sizes. Why is this?
Ivan.
aewine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, that's it. I think many of the conformance tests are way to noisy.
> Many of them spews out lots and lots of output EVEN when
> they actually pass.
Setting WINETEST_DEBUG=0 should do what you want.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g the conformance tests much more
quiet when passing - would the patches be applied?
(Or is there some rationale to the massive chattering from the tests?)
regards,
Jakob
---
Your mail to 'wine-tests-results' with the subject
Wine regressi
On September 5, 2003 05:02 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> No risk of mixing up with the winetests.exe generated regression tests
> either - those have a different subject.
Speaking about the subject, maybe we can improve that a bit to
contain some interesting info such as the version number of the
te
The new list had an immediate response after it showed up on WineHQ -
somebody submitted her testresults of Total Commander run under Wine.
Maybe we should keep it that way? If people submit their stories there,
so much the better - bugzilla will be kept more free from loose ends.
No risk of mix
Jakob Eriksson wrote:
I forwarded the tests I have received so far to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but at the
time I was not yet subscribed... so it says they are awaiting moderation.
Is anyone moderating that particular list?
Okay, I'll take care of that.
And while we are at it, I am going to be out from
I forwarded the tests I have received so far to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but at the
time I was not yet subscribed... so it says they are awaiting moderation.
Is anyone moderating that particular list?
regards,
Jakob
35 matches
Mail list logo
