On September 30, 2003 08:16 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Maybe oneday it would be worth porting the Wine build system to SCons
> (http://www.scons.org/). From "What makes SCons better":
Whenever I look at make replacements, I always find them more
cluttered/verbose/uglier, but this may be because I'm s
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:16:17PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 01:40, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > One problem is that most makefiles specify different defines, so you
> > basically need to have one different rule for each C file. Then there
> > are many files that have explic
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 01:40, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> One problem is that most makefiles specify different defines, so you
> basically need to have one different rule for each C file. Then there
> are many files that have explicit rules. It could be done, but I don't
> think it's worth it, and t
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Some time ago I looked into hacking make_dlls to do this, but there
>> were too many special cases to make it worthwhile.
>
> Too bad, we have a fairly regular structure in dlls/ do you remember
> what the problems were?
One problem is that most
On 29 Sep 2003, Vincent Béron wrote:
> A bit OT: when configure/configure.ac is patched, I assume the next make
> will require a ./configure before (and hence a full make)?
yes, it will require a configure, but chances are that it will invaldate
very little in the cache, so you still get the spee
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Some time ago I looked into hacking make_dlls to do this, but there
> were too many special cases to make it worthwhile.
Too bad, we have a fairly regular structure in dlls/ do you remember
what the problems were?
> And on my new box
> the recurs
Le lun 29/09/2003 à 17:35, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> Just wanted to let people know that ccache works rather well
> with wine. On my lowly 600MHz Pentium box, it takes about
> 1h to compile, after a make clean. Second time through it
> takes about 1/4h to do the same thing, 75% fa
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A nice thing would be to also be able to generate a top
> Makefile that knows all about the project, and we
> no longer do the recursive descent. It takes my box
> almost 20 seconds to do a 'make -s' after a full build.
> Not sure how doable this is
Hi folks,
Just wanted to let people know that ccache works rather well
with wine. On my lowly 600MHz Pentium box, it takes about
1h to compile, after a make clean. Second time through it
takes about 1/4h to do the same thing, 75% faster! (As an
added bonus, CPU utilization dropped from 86% to 60%)
