Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-03 Thread Bill Medland
On December 3, 2004 08:17 am, Vincent Béron wrote: > Le ven 03/12/2004 à 10:15, Bill Medland a écrit : > > On December 2, 2004 10:43 pm, Mike McCormack wrote: > > > Kenneth Porter wrote: > > > >> The bug present in Linux 2.6.[0-7] and is fixed in Linux 2.6.8 and > > > >> later. > > > > > > > > Runn

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-03 Thread Vincent Béron
Le ven 03/12/2004 à 10:15, Bill Medland a écrit : > On December 2, 2004 10:43 pm, Mike McCormack wrote: > > Kenneth Porter wrote: > > >> The bug present in Linux 2.6.[0-7] and is fixed in Linux 2.6.8 and > > >> later. > > > > > > Running 2.6.8-1.521smp on Fedora Core 2. > > > > When I say Linux 2.6

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-03 Thread Bill Medland
On December 2, 2004 10:43 pm, Mike McCormack wrote: > Kenneth Porter wrote: > >> The bug present in Linux 2.6.[0-7] and is fixed in Linux 2.6.8 and > >> later. > > > > Running 2.6.8-1.521smp on Fedora Core 2. > > When I say Linux 2.6.8 fixes the bug, I mean the standard kernel shipped > by Linus.

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread Mike McCormack
Kenneth Porter wrote: The bug present in Linux 2.6.[0-7] and is fixed in Linux 2.6.8 and later. Running 2.6.8-1.521smp on Fedora Core 2. When I say Linux 2.6.8 fixes the bug, I mean the standard kernel shipped by Linus. I've got no idea what Redhat does, and they tend to apply alot of patches t

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Thursday, December 02, 2004 11:15 PM -0500 James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does 'kill -9 processnum' not work? Son of a gun, that did it. I'm so used to avoiding that that it didn't occur to me to try it.

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, December 03, 2004 3:18 PM +0900 Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The bug present in Linux 2.6.[0-7] and is fixed in Linux 2.6.8 and later. Running 2.6.8-1.521smp on Fedora Core 2.

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread Mike McCormack
How can kill -9 not work? It should kill the process without question unless I'm wrong. I think this is a kernel bug that was fixed in more recent kernels. The bug present in Linux 2.6.[0-7] and is fixed in Linux 2.6.8 and later. Mike

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread Steven Edwards
Hi, --- James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Probably not. > > I regularly face them and the only way I know is to reboot > > How can kill -9 not work? It should kill the process without question > unless I'm wrong. I think this is a kernel bug that was fixed in more recent kernels. Th

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread James Hawkins
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:28:01 -0800, Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On December 2, 2004 08:15 pm, James Hawkins wrote: > > > > On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:01:48 -0800, Kenneth Porter > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've now got several instances of "[wine-preloader] " in my ps > > >

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread Bill Medland
On December 2, 2004 08:15 pm, James Hawkins wrote: > On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:01:48 -0800, Kenneth Porter > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've now got several instances of "[wine-preloader] " in my ps > > listing from a game server that's died in some strange way. Anyone have > > experience in cle

Re: wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread James Hawkins
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:01:48 -0800, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've now got several instances of "[wine-preloader] " in my ps > listing from a game server that's died in some strange way. Anyone have > experience in clearing these short of bouncing the whole box? They're > holding

wine-preloader defunct

2004-12-02 Thread Kenneth Porter
I've now got several instances of "[wine-preloader] " in my ps listing from a game server that's died in some strange way. Anyone have experience in clearing these short of bouncing the whole box? They're holding onto a couple of TCP ports that I'd like to use. The ports are stuck in CLOSE_WAIT