James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would a proper implementation of registry mount points require,
> or what is the current implementation doing wrong? Do we want our
> implementation to be more in line with windows'?
I think the current implementation is mostly behaving correctly,
On 20 Apr 2005 18:57:25 +0200, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Registry initialization is already doing a LoadKey, there isn't really
> anything to change here. We still don't have a proper implementation
> of registry mount points though, but that's not really necessary for
> the i
James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't think there's any point in replicating that behavior. I doubt
> > there's any such check on Windows either, it's most likely just a side
> > effect of the way the registry files are "mounted" at different places
> > in the tree. Once we have a
On 4/20/05, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Modified files:
> server : registry.c
>
> Log message:
> Load system.reg and userdef.reg at server init time.
>
Hi Alexandre,
A while back I sent in a patch that restricted RegCreateKey (and it's
internal imp
