Re: wine/dlls/ntdll signal_i386.c exception.c

2005-10-31 Thread Marcus Meissner
> >+" leal-12(%ebp), %eax\n" > >+" .byte 0x64\n" > >+" movl (0),%ecx\n" > > > > > > Is it not possible to use the proper %fs prefix instead of having to put > a bytecode in manually? It will likely not build with all assemblers. This is taken from the wine_push_frame() inline assemble

Re: wine/dlls/ntdll signal_i386.c exception.c

2005-10-31 Thread Robert Shearman
Alexandre Julliard wrote: Index: wine/dlls/ntdll/signal_i386.c diff -u -p wine/dlls/ntdll/signal_i386.c:1.100 wine/dlls/ntdll/signal_i386.c:1.101 --- wine/dlls/ntdll/signal_i386.c 31 Oct 2005 14: 8: 5 - +++ /dev/null 31 Oct 2005 14: 8: 5 - @@ -1384,4 +1384,36 @@ __ASM_GLOBAL_FUN