Re: wine/ tools/runtest misc/options.c include/mod ...

2003-09-26 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why must wines command line options be removed though? They are often > handy for testing things out. They break dll separation, and they interfere with the command line of Winelib apps. It's easy enough to write a wrapper script to handle options if you w

Re: wine/ tools/runtest misc/options.c include/mod ...

2003-09-25 Thread Mike Hearn
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 22:06, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > "Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This will break a lot of HOWTOs on various sites that describe how to get > > apps working with Wine. > > I don't see why, the HOWTOs should explain how to set dll overrides in > the confi

Re: wine/ tools/runtest misc/options.c include/mod ...

2003-09-25 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This will break a lot of HOWTOs on various sites that describe how to get > apps working with Wine. I don't see why, the HOWTOs should explain how to set dll overrides in the config file, that has been the standard way for a long time now. -- Alex

RE: wine/ tools/runtest misc/options.c include/mod ...

2003-09-25 Thread Robert Shearman
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Alexandre Julliard > Sent: 25 September 2003 21:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: wine/ tools/runtest misc/options.c include/mod ... > Removed the --dll option a