On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:33:32PM +0100, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > "Dimitrie" == Dimitrie O Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dimitrie> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Bonnes wrote: WINEDEBUG=+relay wine
> Dimitrie> yourprog.exe
> >> It only works with selected shells...
>
> Dimitri
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:53:18 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>> Ah, holy shell wars :-)
> yes, finally!!!
Bah, just don your toga and use vino dammit :) problem solved!
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Ah, holy shell wars :-)
yes, finally!!!
> An example is worth a lot of explanations. The vanishing wine command line
> option nerved me a long time now. Only today I looked up what can be done to
> start wine with changed variables for that command. For c
> "Dimitrie" == Dimitrie O Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dimitrie> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Bonnes wrote: WINEDEBUG=+relay wine
Dimitrie> yourprog.exe
>> It only works with selected shells...
Dimitrie> s/selected/standard/
Dimitrie> If you have the bad inspiration to
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Dimitrie> WINEDEBUG=+relay wine yourprog.exe
>
> It only works with selected shells...
s/selected/standard/
If you have the bad inspiration to us csh instead,
I think you should know how to translate standard
shell idions into your own. It's just stu
> "Dimitrie" == Dimitrie O Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dimitrie> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> Changelog: documentation/wine.man.in Mention the env command to start
>> a command with modified variables
Dimitrie> Why do you need env(1)? What's wrong with:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Changelog:
> documentation/wine.man.in
> Mention the env command to start a command with modified variables
Why do you need env(1)? What's wrong with:
WINEDEBUG=+relay wine yourprog.exe
--
Dimi.
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Would a patch extending the wrapper to understand all those old but
>> handy options ( --debugmsg , --dll) be acceptable?
Alexandre> No, I think it's better to
Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would a patch extending the wrapper to understand all those old but handy
> options ( --debugmsg , --dll) be acceptable?
No, I think it's better to start using the new mechanism. Otherwise
there will be even more confusion about when you can use the option
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
Alexandre> ... Start deprecating the --debugmsg option.
Would a patch extending the wrapper to understand all those old but handy
options ( --debugmsg , --dll) be acceptable?
--
Uwe Bonnes[EMAIL PROTECT
10 matches
Mail list logo
