> Yes but it would still be interesting to know why the statistics where
> wrong rather than just sweep the problem under the rug.
As I told you, you can run the command
./tools/winapi/winapi_extract --pseudo-stub-statistics --no-verbose
--no-progress > ../winapi_stats.txt
and check the file (i
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, hatky wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2004 22:40, Francois Gouget wrote:
> > Did you find what caused the API count discrepency for winearts.drv and
> > others?
> You said remove them...
Yes but it would still be interesting to know why the statistics where
wrong
On Thursday 01 April 2004 22:40, Francois Gouget wrote:
> Did you find what caused the API count discrepency for winearts.drv and
> others?
You said remove them...
>
> I checked a bigger dll: user32 and got slightly different results. I
> believe this is because your script worked
wine/site/winapi_stats
> and see if it's ok and it there are any more changes needed
Did you find what caused the API count discrepency for winearts.drv and
others?
I checked a bigger dll: user32 and got slightly different results. I
believe this is because your script worked on a slightly olde
As I see you are the only one checking my patches please check
http://hatky.myz.info/wine/site/winapi_stats
and see if it's ok and it there are any more changes needed
--
Hatky,
Worshiper of wine (http://www.winehq.org/),
Impossible is only an opinion.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://www.winehq.org/site/winapi_stats
>
> Is incorrect as it shows Total 19640 100%
> 100% would be nice but its incorect!
I just noticed that there are some extra dlls to filter out:
ttydrv
winealsa.drv
winearts.drv
wineaudioio.d
Hi,
http://www.winehq.org/site/winapi_stats
Is incorrect as it shows Total 19640 100%
100% would be nice but its incorect!
Tom
