Re: widl: Do not generate empty Vtbl structure for empty interfaces.

2013-06-25 Thread Thomas Faber
On 2013-06-25 21:11, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Thomas Faber writes: > >> An alternative solution would be not to generate a vtable structure at all, >> and instead add a dummy member to the class directly. That would be in line >> with what the defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(CINTERFACE) case

Re: widl: Do not generate empty Vtbl structure for empty interfaces.

2013-06-25 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Thomas Faber writes: > An alternative solution would be not to generate a vtable structure at all, > and instead add a dummy member to the class directly. That would be in line > with what the defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(CINTERFACE) case results in, > but require a slightly larger change to