Am Montag, den 03.10.2005, 17:40 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> > So I think we just should switch defaults to a nulldrv, but let the ttydrv
> > lives here and waits for a better times. Please.
>
> Why? It's really an empty skeleton at this point, all it does is mess
> up the screen and
* On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> * Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > So I think we just should switch defaults to a nulldrv, but let the
> > ttydrv lives here and waits for a better times. Please.
>
> Why? It's really an empty skeleton at this point, all it
Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm, I am the one with a non-right mind, who wants to run Microsoft Word
> with a look'n'feel of TurboVision (well, NCURSES would suffice too) and to
> play Diablo1 using AA-lib. I am serious, really. :-)
>
> So I think we just should switch defa
* On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
> What we should probably do, now that we have support for a null
> display driver, is to flesh this out a little more and get rid of the
> tty driver.
Alexandre, you mean to eliminate tty driver from the tree at all?
> I don't think anybody in
Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's been a year or so since my last complaint, time
> to complain again!
>
> wcmd is currently unusable when DISPLAY is not set.
>
> Normally, you can do
> programs/wcmd/wcmd
> and get a nice DOS prompt. However, if you do
> unset DISPLAY
> programs/
It's been a year or so since my last complaint, time
to complain again!
wcmd is currently unusable when DISPLAY is not set.
Normally, you can do
programs/wcmd/wcmd
and get a nice DOS prompt. However, if you do
unset DISPLAY
programs/wcmd/wcmd
you get a nonfunctional DOS prompt; for each ke
