Re: valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-21 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/10/20 Dan Kegel : > coming commits for the day.   The code was compiled with > -O0 -g to give detailed stacks. > Does that still inline functions? I was looking at this one (and the resulting crash?): Invalid write of size 4 at ??? (in /dev/zero) by init_format_filter_info (utils.c

valgrind results for 20 October 2009, take 2

2009-10-20 Thread Dan Kegel
This time with today's commits, and skipping ole32/marshal, since that hangs. Results at http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-10-20-09.31/ There are a few very common errors that I need to file bugs for and then suppress... but there are also quite a large number of valid-looking problems.

Re: valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-20 Thread Dan Kegel
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Unfortunately it seems I don't have --track-origins parameter using 3.3.1. Life is much more fun with that option. I'll post instructions for building valgrind from svn tonight or so. > Do I need any kind of special build with valgrind s

Re: valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Dan Kegel wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Could you provide a whole valgrind command line you're using, assuming that I have 3.3.1 not svn build. Try something like cd dlls/ole32/tests valgrind --trace-children=yes --workaround-gcc296-bugs=yes --track-ori

Re: valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-20 Thread Dan Kegel
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Could you provide a whole valgrind command line > you're using, assuming that I have 3.3.1 not svn build. Try something like cd dlls/ole32/tests valgrind --trace-children=yes --workaround-gcc296-bugs=yes --track-origins=yes -q ../../../wine

Re: valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Austin English wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: Dan Kegel wrote: Are you intentionally dropped user32 tests? "ole32/marshal.c hung, so I don't have any results from past that." Ah, sorry. I thought it's separate, each run.

Re: valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-20 Thread Austin English
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Dan Kegel wrote: > Are you intentionally dropped user32 tests? "ole32/marshal.c hung, so I don't have any results from past that." -- -Austin

Re: valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Dan Kegel wrote: Fresh Valgrind results for the wine conformance tests are available at http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-10-20-01.09/ This is from about six hours ago, so it doesn't include Alexandre's coming commits for the day. The code was compiled with -O0 -g to give detailed st

valgrind results for 20 October 2009

2009-10-20 Thread Dan Kegel
Fresh Valgrind results for the wine conformance tests are available at http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-10-20-01.09/ This is from about six hours ago, so it doesn't include Alexandre's coming commits for the day. The code was compiled with -O0 -g to give detailed stacks. The run uses