Re: usp10: fix tests to allow atomic patches for new implementation

2006-12-15 Thread Clinton Stimpson
James Hawkins wrote: On 12/15/06, Clinton Stimpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Here's a patch to make unimplemented functions return E_NOTIMPL instead of S_OK. Even dependent functions already return E_NOTIMPL. Also fixing tests to check that the return value is S_OK before testing the 'ou

Re: usp10: fix tests to allow atomic patches for new implementation

2006-12-14 Thread James Hawkins
On 12/15/06, Clinton Stimpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Here's a patch to make unimplemented functions return E_NOTIMPL instead of S_OK. Even dependent functions already return E_NOTIMPL. Also fixing tests to check that the return value is S_OK before testing the 'out' parameters. This fi